Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 80 Next »

Thank you for your comments. The feedback on GSIM closed on 27 September. You can follow the progress of the discussions on this page. Comments in addition to those below can be sent by e-mail to therese.lalor@unece.org

 

Log (to be updated by Thérèse Lalor only)

TopicBackground
Object/ Issue
Raised byLast comment
Status
Outcome
Data Structure Component#34Simplifying data structure component objectsThérèse Lalor29 OctOPEN TOPICRevised option added by ABS - for decision. Need to have discussion at #7 first.
Data Channel#36

Channel Activity Specification, Channel Design Specification?

Relationship to Data Resource

Dick Woensdregt29 OctOPEN TOPIC

Objects related to acquisition decided

Still open: Should there be an equivalent for dissemination? Gareth to put up thoughts in one week.

Reference Metadata#17CReference MetadataThérèse Lalor29 OctOPEN TOPIC

Can we do an example like we have an example for quality?

Chris says he could have an example from Eurostat - Metadata Structure Definition.

To be discussed at Sprint

Documentation#25GSIMv2 documentationThérèse Lalor13 SeptWAITINGVote on which GSIM documents you use the most to help us understand what it useful
Views of GSIM#15Creating views of GSIMGareth McGuinness18 JulWAITING 
Modelling#14RelationshipsJenny Linnerud---WAITINGAction: All relationships need to be reviewed and made explicit at Sprint
Modelling#22AttributesThérèse Lalor---WAITINGAction: All attributes need to be reviewed and made explicit at Sprint
Modelling#33DefinitionsThérèse Lalor---WAITING Action: All definitions need to be reviewed at Sprint

Changes to be implemented at Sprint

Instrument Implementation#35Remove all object below Instrument ImplementationDick Woensdregt---WAITING

Following agreements made:

** have to make changes with a good business case**

** not going to leave it as it is **

**balance of simple to understand and not leading down the wrong path **

--> Go to Sprint for elaboration

Acquisition Activites#37Review to definition of a number of acquisition related objectsDick Woensdregt11 OctWAITING

What is the outcome here? Is it a change or an acknowledgement?

depends on result of decision at #35

Interviewer Instruction#27Rename Interviewer InstructionHelen Toole2 OctWAITINGArofan has provided input. For discussion - depends on result of decision at #35
Questions#30Question and Multiple Question ItemHelen Toole2 OctWAITING

Input from Arofan and Chris given. Need a resolution based on that advice

depends on result of decision at #35

Quality#17AQualityThérèse Lalor2 OctDECIDEDnew text attached to wiki. waiting for picture from Helen
Attribute Component#31Attribute ComponentJenny Linnerud2 OctDECIDED

Jenny has provided an improved definition.

Related to issue #31 and #7

Data Set#7

unit data

dimensional data

Thérèse Lalor11 OctDECIDED

We agree to the tenet of it and exact changes - in terms of relationships and definitions - to be worked out at sprint. We also need to tighten up all the definitions of dataset related objects.

Statistical Activity#28What is the difference between Statistical Activity and Process Step Execution RecordDick Woensdregt18 SeptDECIDEDAction: Definition to be improved. we could look into the relationships between these objects. This deserves some attention/discussion.
Process Step#29What does a CSPA Service map to?Dick Woensdregt4 OctDECIDED

GSIM should add a mention of Statistical Service either to the description or examples of a Business Service

Review text at Sprint to ensure alignment

Methodology#17BMethodologyThérèse Lalor5 SeptDECIDEDno changes to be made
Data set#24Distinguishing between different types of datasetsJenny Linnerud

16 Aug

DECIDED

Are we ready to resolve this? Is this something for GSIM version after this one?

Categorized as future work. Is this something other groups could solve? eg Data without Boundaries or Stats Network

Instrument#32Instrument and Instrument Implementation definitionsHelen Toole2 OctDECIDED

 Action: fix the table....

Action: Change definition. Better explanatory text around this. 

Action: Rename instrument implementation to represented instrument. It has the advantage of linguistic consistency

Non Structured Dataset#6Non Structured Data SetThérèse Lalor2 OctDECIDEDAction: Remove and make small text explanation that we may need this in the future
Node Sets#12Hierarchy in Classifications and codelistsHelen Toole06 AugDECIDEDAction: In the documentation we need to have a good example of what is a classification and what is a codelist (drawn from the the comments at the top of the thread). 
Methodology#3Design ContextJenny Linnerud16 JulDECIDEDAction: We are not making changes to the methodology for this version. We should remove this item.
Index/Index Entry#26Index/Index EntryThérèse Lalor13 SeptDECIDED 
Population

#1

 

Add unit type object

Alistair Hamilton

 

01 JulDECIDED

A new object will be added called Unit Type

Action: Definition, relationships and attributed need to be drafted

#13Survey and Frame PopulationsJenny Linnerud27 AugDECIDED

All subtypes of population will be removed

All subtypes of Unit will be remove

#16Add relationship to unit typeHelen Toole4 JunDECIDEDAction: Relationship to Logical Record to be added

Node Sets



#2

Code vs Code List

Category vs Category Set

Klas Blomqvist 13 AugDECIDED

Provide clearer explanation of the differences

Code is kept in the model with better explanation

Action: Text needs to be drafted from examples in discussion forum

#8

LevelHelen Toole26 MarDECIDED

Change the diagrams to include Level in the next release.

Action: New diagrams to be created

#11Statistical Classification CardinalityHelen Toole

22 Apr

DECIDED

Classification Scheme (Statistical Classification) has Mandatory Level

Action: Change the definition of (Statistical Classification) such that it must contain at least one Level.

(Statistical Classification) 1..* Level (Mandatory, Many)

#21Alignment with NeuchatelThérèse Lalor13 AugDECIDED

Change according to proposal

Action:

Remove Classification Version from model

Remove Classification Variant from model

Change Classification to Classification Series

Change Classification Scheme to Statistical Classification

Revise relationships according to proposal

Add attributes according to proposal

Revise definitions

Business Service#4

Business Service

Dissemination Service

Thérèse Lalor09 AprDECIDED

Dissemination Service to be a subtype of Business Service

Action: Text needs to be drafted and attributes aligned

Data Resource#5States of dataJenny Linnerud31 JulDECIDED

Information about how states of data "could be done" should go into the next version of the User Guide, rather than trying to fit into the model

Input to be given by countries using states of data may be done.

Action: Text needs to be drafted

Data Channel#9Data ChannelThérèse Lalor03 JulDECIDED

Data Channel stays in model

Action: Review definition of Data Channel

Representation#10RepresentationThérèse Lalor09 AprDECIDED

Change name of Representation to Presentation

Action: Name changed in documentation and model

Data Point#18Data PointHelen Toole16 JulDECIDED

Example in glossary to be fixed (Proposal 1)

Action: Fix Example

Process Output#19Add Process Output subtypeGareth McGuinness27 AugDECIDED

 Remove all subtypes of Process Input

Remove all subtypes of Process Output

Assessment#20AssessmentGareth McGuinness16 JulDECIDED

Definition to be improved

Action: Fix definition

Data Provider#23Data ProviderJenny Linnerud13 AugDECIDED

No change to model required. Although perhaps clarification in text would help future users?

Action: clarification in text would help future users?

 

 

Open Issues

Topics 40 Replies 206
Topic Author Replies Last Reply
 
 
As raised during the meeting, formally defining Dissemination Service as a subtype of Business
Thérèse Lalor 25 Feb 5 Alistair Hamilton 09 Apr
 
I think we discussed this in the past - the relationship between a population and an object
Alistair Hamilton 01 Feb 18 Dan Gillman 22 Nov
 
Option from Chris. It is the same as Option except that in option 1 Logical record and record
Thérèse Lalor 04 Oct 5 Thérèse Lalor 16 Nov
 
GSIM and Metadata Structures.docx Input from Chris attached. Extra work required to make
Thérèse Lalor 03 Jun 2 Thérèse Lalor 16 Nov
 
16/11: Deadline has passed for input regarding dissemination. No further changes to be made
Thérèse Lalor 04 Oct 5 Thérèse Lalor 16 Nov
 
David - The race/ethnicity example was based on the practical difficulty of writing an exhaustive
Helen Toole 20 May 14 Dan Gillman 05 Nov
 
From Tjalling Gelsema: “ For those interested, even after the verdict, please find below
Thérèse Lalor 19 Mar 14 Thérèse Lalor 01 Nov
Further info from Dick. We need to include this in our consideration as agreed above. GSIM
Dick Woensdregt 11 Sep 5 Thérèse Lalor 30 Oct
Discussion 29/10: To keep or not to keep them. This is a well understood in the implementation
Thérèse Lalor 04 Oct 2 Thérèse Lalor 28 Oct
 
Helen has a new picture drawn which is being tweaked.   Updated Quality Diagram.pptx Scenario
Thérèse Lalor 31 Jul 6 Thérèse Lalor 29 Oct
I am surprised nobody has voted for updating the GSIM Communication document. We have a lot
Thérèse Lalor 13 Aug 2 Gareth McGuinness 28 Oct
Further elaboration from CBS: GSIM Issue: Observation Unit is a structured collection In
Thérèse Lalor 04 Oct 5 Thérèse Lalor 28 Oct
The Reference Period is defined as an attribute of StatisticalProgramCycle, it is mentioned
Thérèse Lalor 31 Jul 1 Thérèse Lalor 28 Oct
 
Helen: I agree with Chris from a modelling perspective, but also from a more practical perspective.
Helen Toole 12 Sep 3 Arofan Gregory 17 Oct
CSPA makes a distinction between business function, business process and business service
Dick Woensdregt 11 Sep 4 Thérèse Lalor 04 Oct
I think it is fair to say that Instructions are a specialized form of statement. The reason
Helen Toole 05 Sep 5 Arofan Gregory 03 Oct
The problem with Instrument and InstrumentImplementation is that an instrument is something
Helen Toole 27 Sep 2 Dick Woensdregt 03 Oct
New Definition: The role given to a Represented Variable in the context of a Data Structure to
Jenny Linnerud 17 Sep 2 Jenny Linnerud 02 Oct
2/10 Discussion: Action: We are not making changes to the methodology for this version. We
Jenny Linnerud 19 Feb 8 Thérèse Lalor 02 Oct
 
Discussion 2/10:  Action: Remove and make small text explanation that we may need this in
Thérèse Lalor 07 Mar 17 Thérèse Lalor 02 Oct
start adding definitions that particularly need to be reviewed or that we have agreed need
Thérèse Lalor 02 Oct 0 -
 
Discussion 18/9: Are we ready to resolve this? Is this something for GSIM version after this
Jenny Linnerud 08 Aug 5 Thérèse Lalor 18 Sep
 
Neuchatel Group discussions: Index and Index Entry will renamed to Classification Index and
Thérèse Lalor 22 Aug 2 Thérèse Lalor 13 Sep
Discussion 5/9: GSIM is method agnostic. We should not tie it to any method. Methodology
Thérèse Lalor 31 Jul 2 Thérèse Lalor 05 Sep
Discussion 27/8: Agreed to remove subtypes of population and unit. How is GSIM going to
Jenny Linnerud 21 May 14 Thérèse Lalor 27 Aug

Instructions for use:

  • To reply to a topic, click on the name of the topic in the table below. Then choose 'add comment' and enter your comment in the box. You can choose 'watch this page' to receive email notifications when new responses are posted. Click save to post your reply.
  • To reply to an existing reply (that is, to continue a discussion thread) follow the instructions about but click 'reply' instead of 'add comment'.
  • To create a new topic, click 'add new discussion topic' below. Once you have added the topic, you will need to enter a title in the box at the top that says 'new page'. Then enter your text in the large text box and when you are done, click 'save' at the top right of the text entry box.

 

 

 

Page viewed 8 times by 1 users since 08 Mar, 2014:
Name Last viewed Times viewed
Anonymous 01 Oct, 2014 22:26 8

 


Search this discussion forum

  • No labels