Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Hi all,

The Neuchatel group have finlised their proposal regarding classification index and classification index entry object. Here is their final picture:

neuchatel with indexes

 

Draft Definitions:

Index: A Classification Index is a list of words or text strings (e.g. the name of a locality, an economic activity or an occupational title and task) that refer to Classification Items refer to Classification Items in one or more Statistical Classifications from the same Classification Family.

Explanatory notes: A Classification index shows the relationship between text found in statistical data sources (responses to survey questionnaires, administrative records) and one or more Statistical Classifications.  A Classification index may be used to assign the codes for classification items to  observations in statistical collections. A Classification Index may be presented in alphabetical order of the text, in code order, or searched electronically.

Index Entry: An index entry is a word or a short text (e.g. the name of a locality, an economic activity or an occupational title) describing a type of object/unit or object property to which the classification version or variant applies, together with the code of the corresponding classification item. Each index entry typically refers to one item of the classification version or variant. Although an index entry may be associated with an item at any level of the classification version or variant, index entries are normally associated with items at the lowest level. 

This proposal adds two objects to GSIM and closely mirrors the original Neuchatel model

 

Questions for GIG:

These objects could be added to the model as Classification Index/Index Entry or as Index/Index Entry. The question is could these objects be broadened out? 

In a response to Issue #24, Chris suggested that Indexes could be used for discovery. Is this a use case to justify broadening out the objects? Should they remain with classifications only?

If they are only for classifications, should indexes be in this level of GSIM? Do they only belong in the Neuchatel annex?

 

 

 

Page viewed 523 times by 22 users since 26 Aug, 2013:
Name Last viewed Times viewed
Anonymous 22 Oct, 2014 11:40 460
Helen Toole 15 May, 2014 04:41 5
Erica Tolcvay 28 Jan, 2014 01:57 2
Andrew Fitzgerald 11 Dec, 2013 02:52 1
CES Bureau 02 Dec, 2013 11:44 1
Thérèse Lalor 16 Nov, 2013 15:27 12
Flavio Rizzolo 16 Nov, 2013 14:50 1
Angelina Dungga Winterleitner 24 Oct, 2013 13:34 5
Isabel Valente 21 Oct, 2013 17:51 2
Tatiana Yarmola 10 Oct, 2013 10:59 4
Margaret Devey 02 Oct, 2013 19:16 2
Carrie Ashley 20 Sep, 2013 06:12 4
Alistair Hamilton 12 Sep, 2013 01:20 4
Justin Lynch 10 Sep, 2013 03:39 2
Sally Vermaaten 05 Sep, 2013 14:06 6
Guillaume Duffes 28 Aug, 2013 15:50 2
Jenny Linnerud 28 Aug, 2013 09:49 3
Alice Born 27 Aug, 2013 22:41 1
Alberto Sanchez 27 Aug, 2013 14:53 2
Mogens Grosen Nielsen 27 Aug, 2013 14:46 2
Colin Bowler 27 Aug, 2013 14:38 1
Gareth McGuinness 27 Aug, 2013 14:38 1

2 Comments

  1. Discussion 27/8:

    Some suggestions to remove index and index entry from the GSIM specification and for it only to be included in the Neuchatel Annex. It was agreed that the proposal from Chris was not quite right.

    Index entries are like aliases. So when you collect data you may get many different responses which are not exactly the item in the classification. An index is a list of all these aliases. 

    After some discussion, two things were agreed:

    1) Index and Index entry will be in the GSIM specification

    2) Dan Gillman and Arofan Gregory should think about this more and report back at the next meeting (5 September)

  2. Neuchatel Group discussions: Index and Index Entry will renamed to Classification Index and Classification Index Entry. They will only have relationships to Classification objects and not to nodesets.