Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Placeholder issue to ensure that we revisit these issues before the GSIM revision

 

 

 

Page viewed 440 times by 13 users since 13 Sep, 2013:
Name Last viewed Times viewed
Anonymous 29 Jul, 2014 19:05 392
Thérèse Lalor 17 Dec, 2013 23:33 18
Flavio Rizzolo 14 Nov, 2013 15:02 2
Gareth McGuinness 01 Nov, 2013 22:38 6
Carrie Ashley 30 Oct, 2013 05:40 6
Colin Bowler 28 Oct, 2013 21:11 3
Helen Toole 28 Oct, 2013 11:24 1
Jenny Linnerud 15 Oct, 2013 22:59 4
Alistair Hamilton 03 Oct, 2013 06:53 1
Jill Pobjoy 30 Sep, 2013 11:50 1
Klas Blomqvist 19 Sep, 2013 11:18 3
Wilhelmus Kloek 19 Sep, 2013 09:17 2
John Csaki 19 Sep, 2013 01:08 1
  • No labels

6 Comments

  1. Structural Quality - in Business, Process Quality - from Production, Product Quality - in Structures?

  2. Discussion 5/9:

    GSIM is an information model. Is the best place to start with the metadata that describes data? There are lots of other places for quality (e.g. process quality). This is an area where we could add a lot of detail but do we need to? What could we focus on that is useful?

    Quality is everywhere. Is having one object that says quality misrepresenting it?

    Quality is important to everything. Is it bigger than GSIM? Can we get this raised in a broader group than us? Lets get the quality experts involved. Modernisation Committee related to evaluation is one avenue. This is a future action.

    Action for now: Review the current use case and assess the goodness of it Wilhelmus Kloek (to talk to Klas and Helen), Alistair Hamilton.   

     

     

  3. Discussion 18/9: 

    From review from Wim and Jenny, we should make minor updates to the text in the current user guide. No major changes needed. Possibly updates from 0.8 to 1.0 needed. To be discussed at the next meeting.

  4. Discussion 2/10: Need to discuss at next meeting. Wim to provide recommendation for the new text.