Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

As organisations begin to use GSIM, this discussion forum will be used to explore issues with the model or propose extensions to the model.

Instructions for use:

  • To reply to a topic, click on the name of the topic in the table below. Then choose 'add comment' and enter your comment in the box. You can choose 'watch this page' to receive email notifications when new responses are posted. Click save to post your reply.
  • To reply to an existing reply (that is, to continue a discussion thread) follow the instructions about but click 'reply' instead of 'add comment'.
  • To create a new topic, click 'add new discussion topic' below. Once you have added the topic, you will need to enter a title in the box at the top that says 'new page'. Then enter your text in the large text box and when you are done, click 'save' at the top right of the text entry box.

Discussion Forum

 

Open Issues

Topics 10 Replies 34
Topic Author Replies Last Reply
 
This box is the methodology (the scientific basis)- not the method. (could be why you have
 Jenny Linnerud 19 Feb 5 Steven Vale 22 Apr
I'm really confused. A Population is an aggregation of Units (figure 11 in the specification).
 Jenny Linnerud 21 May 7 Gareth McGuinness 14 Jun
 
As I understood the discussion, the difference is not in the data structure, but in the way
 Thérèse Lalor 19 Mar 6 Wilhelmus Kloek 06 Jun
Yes, code lists and classification can share categories.  First, code lists or classifications
 Helen Toole 20 May 3 Dan Gillman 04 Jun
 
I prefer proposal 1 - the example just seems wrong to me.
Helen Toole 04 Jun 1 Steven Vale 04 Jun
Placeholder issue to ensure that we revisit these issues before the GSIM revision
Thérèse Lalor 03 Jun 0 -
 
At the IMF, we have also had a go (see diagrams below and GSIM Level 2 description v0.13). We
 Gareth McGuinness 21 May 3 Gareth McGuinness 31 May
One suggestion at METIS 2013 was to include relationships in the glossary. One could use
 Jenny Linnerud 21 May 0 -
It should not be removed without thought. Flag for review at a latter meeting.  
Thérèse Lalor 21 Mar 1 Steven Vale 22 Apr
Whichever type of unstructured data exists the Data Resource cannot, as it is is currently
 Thérèse Lalor 07 Mar 8 Chris Nelson 09 Apr

Add new discussion topic

Issues with recommendations

Topics 9 Replies 42
Topic Author Replies Last Reply
 
 
In terms of the recommendation on code vs code item, it seems the consensus remains that the
 Klas Blomqvist 15 Feb 7 Alistair Hamilton 22 Apr
 
As raised during the meeting, formally defining Dissemination Service as a subtype of Business
 Thérèse Lalor 25 Feb 5 Alistair Hamilton 09 Apr
 
  Current Situation: Recently the GSIM Implementation Group has agreed to include a new
 Helen Toole 03 Jun 0 -
 
Agreed that this is a principle we should follow. There is a caution not to take to the extreme.
 Gareth McGuinness 09 Apr 2 Steven Vale 22 Apr
Recommendation: Information about how states of data "could be done" should go into the next
 Jenny Linnerud 26 Feb 4 Steven Vale 22 Apr
  Context - Current GSIM Cardinality:   Classification Item: Classification Item 1..*
 Berenice Chong 12 Apr 0 -
Recommendation: Change the name of Representation to Presentation in the next version of GSIM.
Thérèse Lalor 25 Mar 7 Jenny Linnerud 09 Apr
 
We might want to add the reasoning behind.
Alistair Hamilton 01 Feb 15 Wilhelmus Kloek 09 Apr
Recommendation: We should change the diagrams to include Level in the next release. A new
 Helen Toole 14 Mar 2 Thérèse Lalor 26 Mar

 

 

 


Search this discussion forum

Labels
  • None