Message-ID: <51503969.1955.1427906575927.JavaMail.confluence@ece-vmapps> Subject: Exported From Confluence MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_Part_1954_1976781758.1427906575926" ------=_Part_1954_1976781758.1427906575926 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Location: file:///C:/exported.html
Remove the following sub-processes, which d= o not consume or produce statistical objects, but instead build, test and p= ut into production technology tools and systems:
3.2 Build or= enhance process components
3.4 Test pro= duction system
3.6 Finalize= production system
These seem to be more appropriately thought= of as part of overarching processes.
The HLG strategic vision demonstrates, in = paragraphs 26 through 31, the pivotal relationship between GSIM and GSBPM, = and how they contribute to the creation of common generic industrial statis= tics. It goes on to explain, in paragraphs 32 and 33, what the official sta= tistics community needs to do with these models in the first instance:
To enable statistical organizations to ar= rive at standardised generic industrialised production of statistics, we fi= rst need to find one another at the conceptual level. We have to bring our = concepts within the blue square under the umbrella of the GSBPM and the GSI= M. This is a very high ambition which will take time. A first goal for the = models is to act as a common language. We are lost if we cannot communicate= properly.
It is obvious that the current version of= the GSBPM is only a starting point which needs to evolve further, the same= way common industrial standards evolve. This holds even stronger for GSIM = for which a first version has yet to be established. The HLG-BAS needs to a= ctively promote development of and convergence on these conceptual standard= s.
The brochure describing GSIM provides the clearest articulation of how G= SIM and GSBPM converge. On page 2 of the brochure, the diagram below shows = how =E2=80=9CGSIM models information that flows between these sub- processe= s".
This pivot point between GSBPM and GSIM is the point at which the models= must converge. There should be conceptual equivalence between the two mode= ls at the point where they intersect. In other words, the domain of GSIM in= formation objects should be equivalent to the domain of objects that GSBPM = sub-processes consumes and produces. This, to me, is what =E2=80=9Cconverge= nce=E2=80=9D means.
Please indicate your support for this change using the stars and legend = below