Message-ID: <1888893809.9012.1416761809994.JavaMail.confluence@ece-vmapps> Subject: Exported From Confluence MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_Part_9011_545064952.1416761809993" ------=_Part_9011_545064952.1416761809993 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Location: file:///C:/exported.html
Since 2009 (when GSBPM V4.0 was released) the purpose, use and context f= or GSBPM has evolved significantly. In 2009 there was no HLG for mode= rnization, much less focus on Business Architecture, no Common Statistical = Production Architecture (CSPA), and no GSIM. The current GSBPM review= (approved by HLG in Feb 2013) seems to recognize and seek to address the l= ast of these points, but not the rest. It will be hard to place the n= ext version of GSBPM in context if some of these matters aren't clarified n= ow. Also, people will continue to have widely divergent views on the = required scope and evolution of the GSBPM if we don't reach broad agreement= on the "mission" for the GSBPM, four years on from the release o= f 4.0. In addition, there should be discussion on what should be in s= cope for review and what should not. We could also get some clarity a= round the extent to which we document the 'out of scope' concerns for futur= e reference, so the good ideas aren't lost over time. Addressing thes= e questions may not change the scope of the updates to be applied in 2013, = but it should provide clarity around the need for future reviews (e.g. well= founded recommendations to the HLG Workshop in November 2013 for more sign= ificant updating of GSBPM in 2014, agreement across the community that the = next round of broader work on GSBPM can wait until 2015 or later, etc.).
See further thoughts on how GSBPM could be integrate= d with a NSI's Business Architecture
Please indicate your support for this change using the stars and legend = below