Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Current proposal from Group

During the METIS meeting in May 2013, it was agreed that the relationship between Neuchâtel and GSIM should be reviewed.

After this meeting, the Neuchâtel working group met with the GIG and it was agreed that the Neuchâtel working group would bring a proposal about how to harmonise/ align the two models at the end of July. After a number of discussions, the Neuchâtel working group would like to put forward the following proposal to the GIG.

 

Neuchâtel and GSIM working together: A two part proposal

1) It is proposed that Neuchâtel becomes part of GSIM. This means that the terminology used in GSIM and Neuchâtel is changed so that there is complete alignment. As such it is proposed that changes are made to the GSIM Specificiation layer in terms of objects, definitions, attributes and relationships (the proposed changes are detailed below).

2) Neuchâtel contains some excellent detail that is very useful to people implementing it. This level of detail is too detailed for the GSIM Specification layer (the current most detailed level of GSIM), but is necessary for those working with classifications. In addition to the changes made to the GSIM Specification Layer, an annex will be written which includes this finer level of detail.

The annex will be able to stand in its own right as a document. It will align completely to the GSIM Specification Layer and will reuse / update much of the content of the current Neuchâtel document. The creation of this document will be the responsibility of the Neuchâtel working group.

The Neuchâtel working group asks that the GIG consider their proposed changes to the classification objects in GSIM.

The proposal is outlined in the diagrams and tables below. Please note that the attributes and relationships pertaining to classification index entries is still being fine tuned by the group.

Current GSIM picture

gsim 1 for gig

Proposal from this group (purple indicates a change to object name or relationship)

gsim 2 for gig

Detailed proposed changes to GSIM:

Current GSIM ObjectProposed changeRevised NameRevised DefinitionRevised Relationships
Classification FamilyChange definitionClassification Family

Definition: A Classification Family comprises a number of Statistical classifications, which are related from a certain point of view. The family may be based on a common Concept (e.g. economic activity).

Explanatory notes: Different classification databases may use different types of Classification Families and have different names for the families, as no standard has been agreed upon.

Source: revised Neuchatel

A Classification Family groups Classification Series

Potential relationship to Classification Index to be added

Classification

Change name

Change definition

Classification Series

Definition: A Classification Series is an ensemble of one or several consecutive Statistical Classifications under a particular heading (for example ISIC or ISCO).

Explanatory notes:

Source: revised Neuchatel

A Classification Series groups Statistical Classifications
Classification Scheme

Change name

Change definition

 

 

Add attributes of version and variant

Add self referential relationship

Statistical Classification

Definition: A Statistical Classification is a set of categories (Classification Items) which may be assigned to one or more Units in statistical surveys or administrative files, and used in the production and dissemination of statistics.

Explanatory notes: The Classification Items are defined in terms of one or more characteristics of a particular Population of Observation Units. A statistical classification may have a flat, linear structure or may be hierarchically structured, such that all Classification Items at lower levels are sub-groups of the next Level up. The Classification Items at each level of the classification structure must be mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive of all objects in the target population.

Source: David

 A Classification Series groups Statistical Classifications

A Statistical Classification can be based on a Statistical Classification

A Statistical Classifications has Classification Items

A Statistical Classifications has Levels

A Correspondence Table compares a Statistical Classification

Classification Version

Remove from GSIM model

Add as attribute of Statistical Classification

------
Classification Version

Remove from GSIM model

Add as attribute of Statistical Classification

------
LevelRevise definitionLevel

Definition: A Statistical Classification has a structure which is composed of one or several Levels. A Level often is associated with a Concept, which defines it. In a hierarchical classification the Classification Items of each Level but the highest are aggregated to the nearest higher level. A linear classification has only one level.

Explanatory notes:

Source: revised GSIM

 A Statistical Classification has Levels

A Level groups a Classification Item

Classification Item

Change definition

Add attributes of case law

Classification Item

Definition: A Classification Item represents a Category at a certain Level within a Statistical Classification. It defines the content and the borders of the Category. A Unit can be classified to one and only one item at each level of a Statistical Classification.

Explanatory notes:

Source: revised Neuchatel

 A Statistical Classification has Classification Items

A Map maps to a Classification Item

A Level groups a Classification Item

MapRevise definitionMap

Definition: An expression of the relation between a Classification Item  in a source Statistical Classification and a corresponding Classification Item in the target Statistical Classification.

Explanatory notes: The map should specify whether the relationship between the two categories is partial or complete

Source: revised GSIM

Correspondence Table contains a Map

Map maps to a Classification Item

Correspondence TableChange definitionCorrespondence Table

Definition: A Correspondence Table expresses the relationship between two Statistical Classifications

Explanatory notes: These are typically:  two versions from the same Classification Series; Statistical Classifications from different Classification Series in the same Classification Family; a variant and the version on which it is based; or, different versions of a variant. In the first and last examples, the correspondence table facilitates comparability over time. Correspondence relationships are shown in both directions.

Source: Revised Neuchatel

Correspondence Table contains a Map

Correspondence Table compares a Statistical Classification


----Add new object

Classification Index

(the group is still discussing exactly what this object should be - including the exact definition, attributes, explanatory text and relationships)

Definition: A Classification Index is a list of words or text strings (e.g. the name of a locality, an economic activity or an occupational title and task) that refer to Classification Items refer to Classification Items in one or more Statistical Classifications from the same Classification Family.

Explanatory notes: A Classification index shows the relationship between text found in statistical data sources (responses to survey questionnaires, administrative records) and one or more Statistical Classifications.  A Classification index may be used to assign the codes for classification items to  observations in statistical collections. A Classification Index may be presented in alphabetical order of the text, in code order, or searched electronically.

Source: Revised Neuchatel

To Be Confirmed

A Classification Index groups Classification Items

A Classification Index [ something ] a Classification Family

Current GSIM picture

code list old for GIG

Proposal from this group (purple indicates a change to object name or relationship)

codelist new for gig

 

 

 

Page viewed 2470 times by 26 users since 26 Jul, 2013:
Name Last viewed Times viewed
Anonymous 23 Sep, 2014 20:33 2348
Helen Toole 15 May, 2014 04:42 5
Flavio Rizzolo 02 Jan, 2014 20:38 6
Stéphane Martineau 20 Nov, 2013 22:30 4
Thérèse Lalor 16 Nov, 2013 15:27 22
Tim Dunstan 13 Nov, 2013 17:15 7
Saija Ylonen 07 Oct, 2013 07:31 1
Tatiana Yarmola 04 Oct, 2013 11:23 5
Andrew Fitzgerald 04 Oct, 2013 02:23 15
Margaret Devey 01 Oct, 2013 16:22 4
Alice Born 12 Sep, 2013 22:47 2
Alistair Hamilton 11 Sep, 2013 09:30 9
Isabel Morgado 10 Sep, 2013 16:18 1
Anne Cheong 28 Aug, 2013 03:35 1
Carrie Ashley 23 Aug, 2013 04:59 3
Sally Vermaaten 21 Aug, 2013 07:53 3
Angelina Dungga Winterleitner 15 Aug, 2013 23:07 4
Colin Bowler 13 Aug, 2013 13:15 7
Max Booleman 07 Aug, 2013 15:51 2
Gareth McGuinness 31 Jul, 2013 17:57 3
Alberto Sanchez 30 Jul, 2013 14:02 1
Jenny Linnerud 30 Jul, 2013 14:02 6
John Machin 30 Jul, 2013 08:50 4
Mogens Grosen Nielsen 29 Jul, 2013 12:33 4
Dan Gillman 26 Jul, 2013 22:39 1
Fiona Willis-Núñez 26 Jul, 2013 16:45 2

5 Comments

  1. Does a variant and the version that it is based upon belong to the same Classification Series or not? This is not clear from the definition of the Classification Series. An example could be given or some explanatory text could be provided to cover this.

  2. Some of the relationships need to be improved e.g. For Correspondence Table: A Correspondence Table compares a Statistical Classifications. For Map: A Map maps to a Classification Items

  3. Index: I do not believe that there should be a relationship betweeen Index and Classification Family. However this may be based on my assuming that Index here is like the Classification Index or Classification Index Entry in the old Neuchãtel. The potential relationships would then be to Statistical Clasification and/or Classification Item, but not Classification Family.

  4. I've two questions:

    1. is there a need for the word 'statistical' in the label 'statistical classification'?
    2. do we need a construct for joining 2 or more classifications into a new overall total? I could imagine to have two (hierarchical) classifications. One is named 'animals' the other is named 'plants'. Could I join both into a classification called 'living things'?
  5. In answer to question 1, the neuchatel group were keen to keep the object as statistical classification. The reason for this is that the restrictions in our definition (e.g mutual exclusivity and exhaustiveness) may only apply the classifications used in within the statistic world and not outside.