The access to data from administrative sources is one of the key barriers to the wider use of such data for statistical purposes. This chapter describes the various frameworks needed to facilitate access to administrative sources, drawing on examples and experiences from several countries. These frameworks typically have several dimensions; legal, policy, organisational and technical, each of which is considered below. It is necessary to reach agreement in all of these areas before the benefits of the use of administrative data can be realised.
3.2 Legal Frameworks
Legal frameworks are normally constructed at the national level, and are specific to national sources and circumstances. In some cases, however, there may also be relevant legislation at either the sub-national (e.g. state) level, or the international level. An example of the latter is the statistical legislation of the European Union, which is binding on Member States. In such cases, it is possible that there are two or more alternative legal gateways to administrative data.
Most national statistical organisations have legal texts defining their roles and responsibilities, typically in the form of a statistics act. In many countries, these legal texts include specific provisions for the access to administrative data. Examples include the statistics acts of Ireland and Norway.
Some national legal frameworks give more powers than others for access to administrative data for statistical purposes. This is because national historical, political and cultural factors have a strong influence on these frameworks. Cultural factors can be particularly important, as some cultures are much more favourable than others to the idea of data sharing between government departments and agencies. As a result of these national differences, legal frameworks are not particularly harmonised or even consistent between countries.
To address this issue of consistency, the European Union has included provisions on access to administrative data in Regulation 223/2009 on European statistics, commonly known as the “Statistical Law”. This Regulation gives the national statistical organisations of Member States the right of access to the administrative data needed to meet their obligations under European statistical legislation, but states that such access is still subject to national limits and conditions.
Individual European Union regulations in specific areas of statistics go further, and remove this dependency on national limits and conditions. An example of this is the business registers regulation, which gives unconstrained access to any administrative sources, where data from these sources are necessary to meet the requirements of the regulation.
As well as giving access to data from administrative sources, legal frameworks also set out the limits to such access, and to the uses of administrative data. Often there are restrictions that data can only be used for specific statistical purposes, and that the confidentiality of individual records should be maintained.
For example, there may be specific restrictions on the use of data for unincorporated businesses, particularly sole-proprietorships, where business data could be considered to be personal data relating to the owner of the business. In such cases, business profit can be seen as equal to personal income. Many countries have data protection legislation covering information about individual citizens, therefore it is important to make clear distinctions between what constitutes business and personal data in such cases.
The legislative process can take time, and statistics may often be seen as a relatively low priority by legislators, so a sustained period of lobbying and highlighting the benefits of using administrative data may be necessary. Given all the efforts that are usually needed to introduce or revise statistical legislation, it is therefore necessary to make the most of the opportunity. In particular, it is essential to avoid the mistake of proposing legislation that just meets current requirements. It may be ten or more years until the next opportunity to revise legislation, so it is necessary to have a long-term strategy for the use of administrative data, and to ensure that the legislative proposals meet all envisaged requirements for the foreseeable future. In this way, legislation can be seen as a short-term barrier, but a long-term opportunity.
Even whilst legislation remains a barrier, it does not necessarily prevent any use of administrative data. In one example, whilst waiting for a suitable legal framework for access to Corporation Tax data, a member of staff from the United Kingdom Office for National Statistics was seconded to the tax agency to explore the feasibility of using these data for statistical purposes. This person had access to the micro-data whilst seconded to, and physically working in the premises of the tax agency, but could only take non-disclosive, aggregate analyses back to the statistical office. This approach meant that various data issues could be addressed, including a proper assessment of the real value of the tax data, whilst simultaneously exploring the possible legal routes to gaining access.
It should also be noted that legislative restrictions often concern the use of micro-data, i.e. information on individual people or businesses. Although statisticians are habitually used to working with data at this level to produce aggregate results, it may sometimes be feasible to work with non-disclosive, low-level aggregates instead. In some cases, this could be done by simply re-defining the statistical unit from the individual to a small group of individuals sharing certain characteristics, perhaps with a weight equal to the number of members of that group.
3.3 Policy Frameworks
Many countries have general policies on data sharing within government, which will influence the right of access to administrative data for statistical purposes. However, it is often easier to change policies than to change laws, and policy tends to evolve over time. It is therefore important that national statistical organisations participate fully in policy development, and take an active part in any discussions within government that might lead to policy changes. In this way, any changes should be formulated in a way that gives the maximum possible benefit to the statistical system.
Policy frameworks also encompass voluntary codes of practice, the most important of which, for statistical purposes, is the United Nations “Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics”. Principle 5 concerns cost-effectiveness, and suggests the use of data from administrative sources in this context:
“Data for statistical purposes may be drawn from all types of sources, be they statistical surveys or administrative records. Statistical agencies are to choose the source with regard to quality, timeliness, costs and the burden on respondents.”
An explanatory note to principle 5 also stresses cost-effectiveness, and goes on to say that:
“Statistical offices must be cost-effective, making the best choice of concepts, sources and methods by balancing quality, timeliness, costs and the reporting load of respondents ...... The overall cost-effectiveness of an agency is influenced by organizational planning and operation, the sound application of statistical methodology, exploitation of information and communication technology and also access to administrative records.”
The code of practice for the European Statistical System contains similar provisions, but the use of data from administrative sources is encouraged in slightly different contexts. Principle 2 concerns the mandate for data collection, and states that:
“Statistical authorities must have a clear legal mandate to collect information for European statistical purposes. Administrations, enterprises and households, and the public at large may be compelled by law to allow access to or deliver data for European statistical purposes at the request of statistical authorities.”
Principle 9 is concerned with ensuring that the burden on respondents to statistical surveys is not excessive. It states that:
“The reporting burden should be proportionate to the needs of the users and should not be excessive for respondents. The statistical authority monitors the response burden and sets targets for its reduction over time.”
One of the proposed indicators to measure the application of this principle is:
“Administrative sources are used whenever possible to avoid duplicating requests for information.”
Codes of practice may also exist at the national level, and are often valuable as a way of reassuring the public that data will only be used for specific and reasonable purposes. To have any real value, it is important that these codes of practice are made available to the general public, typically via the internet site of the national statistical organisation.
3.4 Organisational Frameworks
Once the legal and policy frameworks are in place to permit the use of administrative data, it is necessary to consider the organisational arrangements to facilitate data flows. Typically this takes the form of a written agreement. This may be a contract, particularly if a private sector organisation is involved, but, if the agreement is between government departments or agencies, it is more likely to be a “service level agreement”, “protocol” or “concordat”. The difference is that contracts tend to be legally binding, whereas other forms of agreement are not.
There are certain key features that should be present in any such agreement. These are as follows:
3.5 Technical Frameworks
Technical frameworks refer to the mechanisms by which data are transferred, as well as any relevant data or metadata standards. Data transfer mechanisms can take any form from paper records sent by post to real-time updates via a secure electronic link. The mechanism used has to take into account the technical possibilities open to both the sending and the receiving organisation, so is often a compromise reflecting a sub-optimal solution for at least one of these organisations.
There are a number of international standards for data and metadata transmission, including XML, SDMX and DDI, to name but a few. Some countries also have national versions, particularly for data transfers within government. It is therefore important to agree which standards are to be used.
It is essential to have a legal framework in place to permit the use of administrative data for statistical purposes. The other frameworks described above are not essential, but are very useful for assuring a smooth flow of data, and minimising any problems or misunderstandings between the data supplier and the statistical organisation. For this reason, it is helpful if they are reflected in written documents, agreed by all parties.
Comparing practices between countries can be useful for benchmarking purposes, but it should be remembered that specific national situations and issues often require specific solutions. International standards can help in terms of providing guidance (and compliance with them may be seen as a political goal) so they should be quoted wherever possible in discussions with administrative departments.
 www.irishstatutebook.ie/1993/en/act/pub/0021/index.html (See sections 30 and 31)
 www.ssb.no/english/about_ssb/statlaw/statlov_en.html (See chapter 3-2)
 Article 24 of Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on European statistics:
 Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 177/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 establishing a common framework for business registers for statistical purposes: