• Issue 2: Clarify Quality and Metadata Management
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

 

Clarify better what is in quality and metadata management as compared to the quality and metadata that are part of the statistical process

An example of combined use is for instance the process of designing a statistical production process. The result of the process will be a document describing the designed process. This document is not only input to building the production process, but also to running the process (as it will specify the sequence, the parameters and process quality indicators and norms). In short, the specification of the production process includes the metadata system (this in addition to my point 2).

 

I have now checked with my dear colleagues. This largly confirmed my contribution with some further details and considerations. In general it was stressed that the GSBPM as such has been useful and the inherent need to change is low. The fundamental reason for change is that the GSBPM should be used in combination with the GSIM. This requires a high consistency in language.

 

Please indicate your support for this change using the stars and legend below

  • 5* (We should do this)
  • 4* (Good idea, but need to discuss)
  • 3* (I am not sure, we need to discuss)
  • 2* (Should not make the change, but need to discuss)
  • 1* (Should not make this change)
Your Rating:
Results:
PatheticBadOKGoodOutstanding!
10 rates
  • No labels

1 Comment

  1. Discussion 30/9:

    Is quality almost a separate project? Links to GSBPM, GSIM, CSPA? NQAF?

    Some information in the annexes. These could become separate documents in future.

    Paragraphs 13 and 14 about overarching processes could be expanded. ACTION 

    Sweden has an overarching process called Infrastructure which does take into account some of aspects discussed. 

    NZ - Quality gates are used at points of GSBPM.

    ABS - overarching processes are good.