Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

 

ABS production staff see the designing, building/assembly and testing of data collection instruments to be Design processes, particularly in the future world where instruments are assembled dynamically from metadata specified in the Design phase.  The testing of instruments is also very different from the testing of systems included in the Build phase, and is more similar to testing various options for sample design, which is done in the Design phase.  As such, it is recommended that process 3.1 be moved from the Build phase into the Design Data Collection Methodology sub-process 2.3.

 

 

 

Page viewed 1196 times by 12 users since 27 Sep, 2013:
Name Last viewed Times viewed
Anonymous 20 Sep, 2014 01:55 1155
Thérèse Lalor 31 Oct, 2013 04:34 23
Wilhelmus Kloek 30 Oct, 2013 22:00 1
Gareth McGuinness 30 Oct, 2013 22:00 4
Nadia Mignolli 30 Oct, 2013 18:19 1
Mats Bergdahl 30 Oct, 2013 10:02 1
Eden Brinkley 29 Oct, 2013 12:26 4
Lynne Bismire 29 Oct, 2013 04:40 2
Juan Munoz-Lopez 24 Oct, 2013 20:02 1
Jill Pobjoy 14 Oct, 2013 15:06 2
Gary Dunnet 30 Sep, 2013 10:00 1
Steven Vale 30 Sep, 2013 09:00 1

Please indicate your support for this change using the stars and legend below

  • 5* (We should do this)
  • 4* (Good idea, but need to discuss)
  • 3* (I am not sure, we need to discuss)
  • 2* (Should not make the change, but need to discuss)
  • 1* (Should not make this change)
Your Rating:
Results:
PatheticBadOKGoodOutstanding!
12 rates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • No labels

1 Comment

  1. Discussion 31/10:

    Metadata design should be in the design phase. 

    Moving into mixed mode world. implementing metadata into the different modes is separating, effect big data.

    Are we at the "push the button" stage yet? We are still in 'As-is', maybe some developed do.

    No change